A
week or so ago I went to the cinema. I don’t go often, and when I
do it is usually to see arty-farty stuff like the National TheatreLive performances (which are superb).
But
this time I went to watch the latest, big ticket film. It was the
wrong time of year to go really. The trailers that were showing were
those for the summer blockbusters – Oblivion (Tom Cruise) and
Olympus Has Fallen (Gerald Butler and Morgan Freeman). This year must
be ‘O’ year, clearly.
One
is apocalyptic, the other post-apocalyptic. Both involve a lot of
running around, shooting things and – for the ladies – reasonably
attractive and muscled men. It’s the standard formula: the world is
facing some sort of apocalyptic event, and iconic building gets
destroyed, the world survives.
They
say there are just seven Hollywood storylines:
Rags
to Riches
Quest
(including logical quests, thereby mysteries)
Voyage
and Return
Comedy
Tragedy
Rebirth
(essentially one form of good-overcoming-evil, the chap who learns
the error of his ways)
Overcoming
the Monster (including all good-overcoming-evils)
I question all of these. Most particularly I
fail to see the difference between Quest and Voyage and Return, other
than the ‘return’ aspect. It also doesn’t really suit romances
(though these are often ‘rom-coms’, and thereby falling into
‘Comedy’, albeit that the comedy element is often rather
tenuous). One day I may make my own list...
Anyhow,
these apocalyptic endeavours fall into the last category –
Overcoming the Monster. The monster being whatever doom is
threatening the world on this particular occasion.
The
doom is varied. It could be natural (The Day After Tomorrow; TheCore) Extraterrestrial (Independence Day, Star Wars and Superman
probably also fit in this category even though the hero is also
alien) human (almost every James Bond) inhuman (Jaws, Jurassic Park)
or intergalactic (Deep Impact, Armageddon). Admittedly, they started
out not being very apocalyptic – Jaws only terrified a single town,
for example. However as each summer has approached, the stakes have
been raised, the terror has had to become greater, the target
greater: the idea that “it was just a small town in America,
nowhere near us” becoming less and less easily dismissed.
One
of the risks with this it that as the threat becomes bigger and
target wider, so it becomes more extraordinary, less believable, more
farcical. The stakes get raised so high that the chips topple – a
film tries too hard and becomes too epic for its own good.
But
in addition to them each trying to outdo each other, so they also
nullify us. We expect more bodies, more chases, more fights, more
noise. Yes, one compromise is story; but the other is shock. Nothing
shocks us any more. When Deep Impact was released, rather than raving
about the storyline (though it may have suffered there from being
released at the same time as Armageddon which had an identical
storyline – there’s only so much you can say about a meteor)
everyone was talking about the noise. It was the loudest film to have
been released at the cinema up until that time.
There’s
not much else you can say about them really. We know the story –
there will be some sort of devastating threat; there will be an
unusual or unexpected hero; there will be a death of at least one of
the main characters (a low helps make the high higher, the overcoming
all the more remarkable); a romance (for the ladies); a lot of
special effects; and a happy ending. Oh, and probably a soundtrack
featuring Aerosmith.
The
most recent addition has been the destruction of an icon – the
Statue of Liberty, the White House, the Empire State Building etc.
They become more and more absurd. If you had said “the White House
is destroyed in a massive fireball after suffering a direct hit from
an alien spaceship” then an ordinary producer would have thrown it
out; but since Independence Day, the producer would say “it’s
been done before. Maybe a fleet of spaceships. Or the entirety of
America. Or maybe it’s actually a super-volcano”.
It’s
exhausting. In fact, it’s not any more. It’s boring. Just as
overuse of antibiotics has made bugs resistant to them, so we have
become ennumbed by excess. Whilst they try to think of newer, more
epic, more novel ways, so in turn they seem less inventive, less
distinctive, more farcical.
Perhaps
it’s time for a change. Or at least a rest.
No comments:
Post a Comment